Opinions have reasons, not all reasons are equal
February 22, 2012 at 4:09 pm Chris King
The news media continues to report stories about potential health risks from the radio frequency emissions of smart meters — even though such risks remain unproven after intense studyand scrutiny. There also have been many news stories aboutcustomers who want to opt out of smart meter programs — even though fewer than one in 1,000 customers has elected to do so.
This got me wondering: What makes a story important enough to be in the news, and how should we consider these reports? Whose opinions really matter?
The January issue of Miller-McCune Magazine — a nonpartisan, thoughtful publication for business and policy leaders which I’ll often skim during long overseas flights — reports on a successful effort to teach critical thinking to sixth graders. No debate: Kids can learn by arguing describes the work of Deanna Kuhn, professor of psychology and education at Columbia University.
Full post: Opinions have reasons, and some reasons are better than others
Entry filed under: health effects, Research, Smart Meters. Tags: columbia university, critical thinking, debate, education.
Trackback this post